I question why a parking agreement for offsite parking needs to be granted.
I feel that the reasons are self-imposed.
The site plan for the proposed outdoor dining expansions area conveniently(?) neglects to indicate there are already (5) existing parking stalls in this area. Also, will the physical removal of theses stalls decrease the number of required parking stalls for Sterling Commons complex, Thus putting this property into non-compliance?
I am sure there are cross agreements, technically the restaurants and the outdoor dining will be located on two different tax parcels.
The 2COP alcohol beverage permit is for 718 & 722 Broadway. However, the parking lot parcel where the dining is proposed has a Main Street address. I'm not sure how other permits are affected? Legal loopholes can create issues that no city government really wants to deal with.
Have a pleasant evening.
I question why a parking agreement for offsite parking needs to be granted.
I feel that the reasons are self-imposed.
The site plan for the proposed outdoor dining expansions area conveniently(?) neglects to indicate there are already (5) existing parking stalls in this area. Also, will the physical removal of theses stalls decrease the number of required parking stalls for Sterling Commons complex, Thus putting this property into non-compliance?
I am sure there are cross agreements, technically the restaurants and the outdoor dining will be located on two different tax parcels.
The 2COP alcohol beverage permit is for 718 & 722 Broadway. However, the parking lot parcel where the dining is proposed has a Main Street address. I'm not sure how other permits are affected? Legal loopholes can create issues that no city government really wants to deal with.
Have a pleasant evening.